Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01740
Original file (BC 2013 01740.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-01740
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  YES

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, be amended to reflect time served in Kuwait.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her DD Form 214 does not list her 1999 overseas duties in Kuwait 
nor does it include Afghanistan during Operation Enduring 
Freedom in 2002.  This correction needs to be made for 
employment opportunities.

In support of the applicant’s appeal, she provides a certificate 
for providing fire protection in support of Operation Enduring 
Freedom from 1 September 2002 to 1 December 2002.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

After serving 4 years and 11 months on active duty the applicant 
was honorably released on 10 February 2003 and transferred to 
the Air Force Reserve under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 
(Completion of Required Active Service).

On 25 April 2013, AFPC/DPAPP advised the applicant they were 
able to verify and confirm boots on ground foreign service time 
at Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan, from 1 September 2002 to 
1 December 2002, for 3 months and 1 day.  They requested the 
DD Form 214 be corrected and a copy sent to the applicant.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial.  DPSID states the Directorate of 
Assignments and the Defense Finance and Accounting Service were 
unable to verify foreign service time in Kuwait; therefore, 
unable to verify any awards based on service in Kuwait.  
However, they verified the applicant's boots on ground foreign 
service time at Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan, from 1 September 
2002 to 1 December 2002.  In addition, the Defense Finance and 
Accounting Service have verified the applicant's deployment to 
Saudi Arabia, from 17 March 2000 to 2 June 2000.

DPSID was able to verify award of the Afghanistan Campaign Medal 
with one Bronze Service Star and the Air Force Expeditionary 
Service Ribbon with Gold Border.  Upon final board decision, 
administrative correction of the applicant's official military 
personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR.

The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 4 April 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 
30 days (Exhibit E).  As of this date, no response has been 
received by this office.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that 
insufficient evidence has been presented to amended the 
applicant’s record to reflect foreign service time in Kuwait.  
Therefore, other than the administrative corrections cited 
above, we find no basis to recommend granting any additional 
relief sought in this application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.  
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-01740 in Executive Session on 3 July 2014, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 22 March 2013, w/atch.
  Exhibit B.  DD Form 214 and Enlisted Performance Reports.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 21 June 2013.
  Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 April 2014.




2


3



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01290

    Original file (BC-2012-01290.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01290 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _____________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: 1. AFPC/DPSID will also administratively correct the applicant’s record to reflect the following medals and/or ribbons: 1. In regard to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02354

    Original file (BC 2013 02354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is entitled to the contested award due to deployments to Saudi Arabia in support of Desert Wind, Desert Fox and a deployment to Afghanistan in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. Therefore, the applicant meets the criteria for the AFEM for his direct support of Operation SOUTHERN WATCH, for both deployments. Upon final board decision, administrative correction of the applicant’s official...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01621

    Original file (BC 2013 01621.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The time reflected in block 11 (Primary Specialty) of her DD Form 214 of 5 years and 10 months should be the same as the time (6 years) in block 12 (Record of Service). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2009-00802

    Original file (BC-2009-00802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM). However, the award criteria for the ACM states no member shall be entitled to both the GWOT-E medal for that service. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 7 Mar 13, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2009- 00802: Exhibit E. Record of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02329

    Original file (BC 2013 02329.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the AFOUA w/V, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, there was no official evidence showing the applicant was attached or assigned to a unit that received the award. Additionally, in view of the fact that we have determined that there is sufficient evidence to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04003

    Original file (BC 2013 04003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition to being the 455th Expeditionary Operations Group (EOG) Commander, he was the A-10A flight leader and expended live ammunition in direct support of the 82nd Airborne Division and U.S. Army Special Operations units. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPSID recommends the request be denied and that the applicant submit for a one-time reconsideration of the CAM to USAFCENT in order to exhaust the available administrative remedies....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01804

    Original file (BC-2013-01804.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon the final Board decision, administrative correction of his official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we are not persuaded that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the AFEM w/1OLC. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 27 Jan 2014, under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03354

    Original file (BC 2014 03354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was awarded the following Air Force awards and medals: a. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice regarding the applicant receiving the AFOUA w/3BOLC and award of the AFCRM. We note the Air Force OPRs have verified the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03640

    Original file (BC 2014 03640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was credited with the appropriate foreign-service for his service time in Iraq (Administratively corrected). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in a combat zone in Iraq during Operation IRAQI FREEDOM for more than 90 consecutive days, but did not receive the appropriate decorations or foreign-service credit for his deployment to Iraq. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01436

    Original file (BC-2012-01436.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01436 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards: 1. DPSID states after a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel record and provided documentation, they verified award of the GWOT-S, GWOT-E, KDSM, and the Air Force Expeditionary Service...